RAMS — Risk Assessment and Method Statement — sit at the centre of construction health and safety management in the UK. In practice the RAMS pack a principal contractor receives often also carries supporting COSHH assessments and competence/training evidence alongside the two core documents. Yet most guidance conflates the documents, obscures which regulations actually create the duty, and leaves contractors guessing about what is legally required versus what is simply good practice. This page sets the record straight, grounds every claim in primary legislation or HSE guidance, and gives you a concrete worked example you can map against your own projects.
What RAMS Means in UK Construction — and Why the Two Documents Are Legally Distinct
RAMS stands for Risk Assessment and Method Statement. The acronym packages two legally distinct documents that serve different purposes:
| Risk Assessment | Method Statement | |
|---|---|---|
| What it answers | What could go wrong, and how likely/severe? | How will the work be done safely, step by step? |
| Legal root | Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 (MHSWR), reg 3 — a direct statutory duty on every employer; task-specific regulations (e.g. Work at Height Regulations 2005, COSHH 2002) add further assessment duties that shape the content | No standalone statutory instrument; satisfies the Construction Phase Plan obligations under CDM 2015, reg 12, and supports the reg 3 duty in practice |
| Who it protects | Employees and any other person affected by the work | Workers carrying out the task; others on site who may be affected |
| When required | Before work begins; reviewed when no longer valid or after significant change | Before a trade package starts on site; updated if scope or method changes |
| Recording threshold | Must be recorded in writing where the employer has five or more employees (MHSWR reg 3(6)) | Good practice to record in all cases; required by principal contractors as part of the Construction Phase Plan |
The key point: a Method Statement is not a standalone statutory requirement. The legal driver is the Construction Phase Plan under CDM 2015 reg 12, and the risk assessment under MHSWR reg 3. The Method Statement is the industry-standard vehicle for satisfying both duties together for a defined trade package.
The Legal Duty Chain: Which Regulations Actually Require RAMS
Two regulations create the core duty chain:
1. MHSWR 1999, reg 3 — risk assessment Every employer must make a suitable and sufficient assessment of the risks to health and safety of their employees and of persons not in their employment arising out of or in connection with the conduct of their undertaking. (MHSWR reg 3(1)) This duty is absolute — it applies regardless of project size, number of contractors, or whether HSE has been notified.
2. CDM 2015, reg 12 — construction phase plan The principal contractor must draw up a construction phase plan before setting up a construction site, and must ensure it is appropriately reviewed, updated and revised throughout the project. (CDM 2015, reg 12(1) and (4)) The plan must set out health and safety arrangements and site rules, taking account of industrial activities on site.
CDM 2015 also requires designers, principal designers, principal contractors and contractors to take account of the general principles of prevention — in summary: avoid risks where possible; evaluate those that cannot be avoided; put in place proportionate measures that control them at source. (HSE L153)
What a Compliant Risk Assessment Must Contain (MHSWR Reg 3 Mapped to Site Practice)
Under MHSWR reg 3, a risk assessment must be suitable and sufficient. HSE's five-step framework provides the practical structure: (HSE — Steps needed to manage risk)
- Identify hazards — what could cause harm in this task/environment?
- Assess the risks — who might be harmed, how, and how likely/severe?
- Control the risks — what existing controls are in place; what further measures are needed?
- Record your findings — required in writing where the employer has five or more employees (MHSWR reg 3(6))
- Review the controls — review if no longer valid or after a significant change (MHSWR reg 3(3))
Before work starts, information gathering should include the client, design team, contract documents, main and specialist contractors, equipment and material suppliers, and HSE guidance — with particular attention to asbestos or other contaminants, overhead power lines and underground services, unusual ground conditions, and nearby schools, footpaths, roads or railways. (HSG150)
What a Method Statement Must Contain — and What CDM 2015 Says About the Construction Phase Plan
A Method Statement describes how a specific task will be carried out safely. It typically covers:
- Scope of work and sequence of operations
- Plant, equipment, and materials to be used
- Specific hazards identified in the risk assessment and how each is controlled
- Competency and training requirements for operatives
- Emergency arrangements
- Environmental controls (noise, dust, spoil disposal)
The Construction Phase Plan under CDM 2015 reg 12 must set out health and safety arrangements and site rules. Subcontractor Method Statements are the mechanism by which a principal contractor collects and coordinates trade-level safe working information into that plan. HSG150 is explicit that obtaining health and safety risk assessments and method statements from subcontractors helps identify risks that their operations may create for others on site. (HSG150, para 25)
Who Produces RAMS and Who Is Responsible
- Subcontractor / trade contractor: produces the risk assessment (MHSWR reg 3 duty) and method statement for their own trade package.
- Principal contractor: appointed by the client to control the construction phase of any project involving more than one contractor; must plan, manage, monitor and coordinate the entire construction phase, taking account of health and safety risks to everyone affected, including members of the public. (HSE CDM 2015: principal contractors) The PC must also ensure that employers and, where necessary, self-employed persons apply the general principles of prevention consistently and, where required, follow the construction phase plan. (CDM 2015, reg 13(3)(c))
- Client: must ensure those they appoint have the skills, knowledge and experience to carry out work in a way that secures health and safety; if the appointed party is an organisation, it must also have appropriate organisational capability. (L153)
Notification Thresholds: When Your Project Must Be Reported to HSE
A construction phase plan is required for every construction project under CDM 2015 — including small-scale routine work such as kitchen or bathroom installations, structural alterations, roofing work, and extension or loft conversions. (CIS80)
If the job will last longer than 500 person days or 30 working days with more than 20 people working at the same time, it must be notified to HSE and the construction phase plan will need to be more comprehensive. (CIS80) Below these thresholds, a simpler plan is usually sufficient to demonstrate that health and safety has been considered — but the underlying MHSWR reg 3 risk assessment duty applies regardless.
Worked Example: Groundworks Subcontractor RAMS on a Domestic Extension Project
Scenario: A groundworks subcontractor (5 employees) is engaged by a principal contractor to carry out reduced-level dig, strip footings, and concrete foundations for a two-storey rear extension on a domestic property. Duration: 8 working days, maximum 4 workers on site simultaneously. The project does not meet HSE notification thresholds.
How the Groundworks RAMS Maps to the Legal Framework
| RAMS Element | What the Document Must Cover | Legal / Guidance Root |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Assessment — Hazard: excavation collapse | Identify risk of unsupported trench walls; assess likelihood given soil type; control: shore or batter to safe angle, inspect before entry | MHSWR reg 3; CIS80 (collapse of excavations) |
| Risk Assessment — Hazard: underground services | Check utility drawings; use CAT scanner before breaking ground; mark service routes | MHSWR reg 3; HSG150 (underground services) |
| Risk Assessment — Hazard: asbestos | Confirm client has provided pre-demolition survey results; stop-work protocol if ACMs encountered | MHSWR reg 3; HSG150 (asbestos); CIS80 |
| Risk Assessment — Hazard: manual handling / plant interface | Assess excavator swing radius; exclusion zones; banksman requirements | MHSWR reg 3 |
| Risk Assessment — Recording | Significant findings recorded in writing (5+ employees) | MHSWR reg 3(6) |
| Method Statement — Sequence | Step-by-step: set out → topsoil strip → bulk dig → footing excavation → concrete pour; plant: 3T tracked excavator + dumper | CDM 2015 reg 12 Construction Phase Plan |
| Method Statement — Competency | Excavator operator: CPCS card or equivalent demonstrated competence (industry scheme, not statutory); banksman: trained and briefed | L153 (skills, knowledge and experience) |
| Method Statement — Emergency | Site emergency contact; nearest A&E; trench rescue protocol | CDM 2015 reg 13 (PC coordination duty) |
| PC Construction Phase Plan | PC incorporates groundworks method statement; site rules (exclusion zones, banksman) referenced in CPP | CDM 2015 reg 12(2) |
| Workforce briefing | Groundworks operatives briefed on method statement content before excavation begins; sign-off recorded | CDM 2015 reg 13; L153 (consulting and engaging workers) |
Briefing RAMS to the Workforce — The Sign-Off Requirement Principal Contractors Cannot Skip
CDM 2015 reg 13 places a duty on the principal contractor to ensure workers receive site-specific inductions and that employers and self-employed persons follow the construction phase plan. L153 reinforces that consultation involves giving information to workers, listening to them, and taking account of what they say before decisions are made — and that meetings before work starts to discuss the work planned, identify risks, and agree control measures are an effective way to do this.
A written briefing record provides the audit trail. Use and adapt the template below to your site:
RAMS Workforce Briefing Record (Template)
Project: _____________________________ Date: _______________
Principal Contractor: _____________________________ Site Address: _____________________________
Trade Package / Task: _____________________________
RAMS document reference & version: _____________________________
Briefing delivered by (name & role): _____________________________
| Name | Company | Signature | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
Key points covered in briefing (tick all discussed):
- Scope and sequence of works
- Principal hazards and control measures
- Exclusion zones / site rules
- Emergency arrangements and muster point
- Who to report a near-miss or change in conditions to
- Any RAMS update since last briefing
Any worker concerns raised and actions agreed:
Briefing record retained by: _____________________________ Location: _____________________________
Review and adapt this template to the specific site, task and workforce. It must be completed by a competent person familiar with the RAMS content.
RAMS Readiness Checklist: Legal Minimum vs Good Practice
| Element | Required by Law? | Source | Good Practice Only? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suitable and sufficient risk assessment | Yes — every employer | MHSWR reg 3(1) | — |
| Written record of significant findings (5+ employees) | Yes | MHSWR reg 3(6) | — |
| Review of risk assessment after significant change | Yes | MHSWR reg 3(3) | — |
| Construction phase plan before site setup | Yes — every project | CDM 2015 reg 12(1) | — |
| CPP reviewed and updated throughout project | Yes | CDM 2015 reg 12(4) | — |
| Principal contractor appointed (2+ contractors) | Yes | CDM 2015; HSE CDM guidance | — |
| PC ensures workers follow CPP; apply prevention principles | Yes | CDM 2015 reg 13(3)(c) | — |
| Site-specific induction for all workers | Yes | CDM 2015 reg 13(4)(a) | — |
| HSE notification (>500 person days OR >30 working days with >20 simultaneous workers) | Yes — where thresholds met | CIS80 | — |
| Appointees checked for skills, knowledge and experience | Yes | L153 / CDM 2015 | — |
| Step-by-step method statement per trade package | No standalone duty | — | Yes — best practice to satisfy CPP and reg 3 |
| Named competency / card requirements per operative | No standalone duty | — | Yes |
| Written workforce briefing sign-off record | No standalone duty | — | Yes — supports PC's CDM 2015 reg 13 duty |
| Version control / document revision history | No standalone duty | — | Yes |
| Residual risk rating after controls applied | No standalone duty | — | Yes |
How RamsDocs Removes the Document-Production Bottleneck
Manual RAMS workflows — blank Word templates, PDF attachments, email chains, version confusion — introduce delays and create compliance gaps before a spade goes in the ground. RamsDocs is built specifically for UK construction teams who need to produce review-ready RAMS documents faster without cutting compliance corners.
The platform gives you:
- Structured templates that map to the MHSWR reg 3 five-step framework and CDM 2015 CPP requirements, so nothing legally significant is accidentally omitted
- Trade-specific hazard libraries pre-populated with the hazard categories that matter for groundworks, roofing, fit-out, M&E and other packages
- Version control and revision tracking so the PC always holds the current document and review history
- Digital briefing records that capture operative sign-offs against a specific RAMS version — supporting the CDM 2015 reg 13 duty and providing an audit trail
RamsDocs produces PC review-ready documents designed to reduce RAMS rework. It does not replace the judgement of a competent person, and every document produced must be reviewed and adapted to the specific site, task and workforce before use.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does RAMS stand for in construction? Risk Assessment and Method Statement — two distinct documents often produced together as a single package for a defined trade or task.
Are RAMS documents a legal requirement on UK construction sites? The risk assessment component is a direct legal duty under MHSWR reg 3 for every employer. The Construction Phase Plan is required for every construction project under CDM 2015 reg 12. A Method Statement is industry practice that satisfies those duties in combination — it is not a standalone statutory instrument.
What must a risk assessment include under UK law? Under MHSWR reg 3, it must be suitable and sufficient: identify hazards, assess who might be harmed and how, determine control measures, record significant findings (5+ employees), and be reviewed when no longer valid or after significant change.
What must a method statement include? There is no statutory list, but to satisfy the CDM 2015 CPP duty and support the MHSWR reg 3 risk assessment, it should cover: scope and sequence of work, plant and equipment, hazard controls, competency requirements, and emergency arrangements.
Who is responsible for producing RAMS? Each employer (including subcontractors) holds the MHSWR reg 3 duty for their own work. The principal contractor holds the CDM 2015 reg 12 duty for the Construction Phase Plan and must coordinate subcontractor RAMS within it.
How do RAMS fit into the Construction Phase Plan under CDM 2015? Subcontractor risk assessments and method statements are the trade-level input to the principal contractor's Construction Phase Plan. The PC must ensure they are followed (CDM 2015 reg 13(3)(c)) and keep the plan updated throughout the project (reg 12(4)).
When does a project need to be notified to HSE? Where the project will last longer than 500 person days or 30 working days with more than 20 people working at the same time, it must be notified to HSE. (CIS80)
How can RAMS documents be briefed to the workforce on site? CDM 2015 reg 13 requires the PC to ensure workers are inducted and that the CPP is followed. L153 describes pre-work briefings — covering risks, controls, and the day's planned work — as an effective way to consult and engage workers. A written sign-off record provides the audit trail.
Disclaimer: The information on this page is provided for general guidance only. All RAMS documents and templates must be reviewed and adapted to the specific site, task and workforce by a competent person before use. Nothing on this page constitutes legal advice, and RamsDocs does not guarantee that any document produced will be accepted by a principal contractor, approved by the HSE, or be free from legal challenge. Construction health and safety is your responsibility. Does RAMS in construction include COSHH assessments, or are they separate documents? In practice, the full documentation package demanded by principal contractors typically encompasses risk assessments, method statements, COSHH assessments, and training records — even though the acronym RAMS strictly covers only the first two. Certain regulations require specific assessments for defined hazards, including hazardous substances under COSHH, work at height, manual handling, noise, and vibration, which sit alongside the general MHSWR reg 3 duty. (Construction method statements (managing the work)) Where your trade package involves substances hazardous to health, include a COSHH assessment as a discrete section within or alongside your RAMS submission — consolidating all hazard documentation in one place and signposting the relevant Safety Data Sheets.
Will having RAMS ready help with SSIP, CHAS, SafeContractor, or Constructionline applications? Pre-qualification and accreditation schemes evaluate a contractor's safety competence using documentary evidence, and the quality of your risk assessments and method statements is a central part of that scrutiny. Maintaining a library of well-structured, task-specific RAMS means you have ready-made supporting evidence when completing accreditation submissions or responding to tender pre-qualification questionnaires. Assessors typically look for demonstrations that hazards have been identified, controls selected, and operatives briefed — all of which a well-prepared RAMS package directly evidences.
Sources Used
This guide is checked against official source material. Verify current legal duties against the live legislation and HSE guidance before relying on the content for a live project.
- Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, regulation 3 (legislation.gov.uk)
- Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 (legislation.gov.uk)
- Managing risks and risk assessment at work (HSE)
- Planning for construction work (HSE)
Put This Guide To Work
Use the related templates, trade hubs and free tools below to turn the guidance into a site-specific RAMS workflow.